Lawyers representing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have informed the court that he will only be available to testify in his ongoing corruption trial in March 2025. This announcement comes amidst heightened public and political interest in the proceedings, which have significant implications for Netanyahu’s political future.
During a court session on June 20, 2024, Netanyahu’s legal team cited the Prime Minister’s busy schedule and pressing state matters as reasons for the delay. “Given the Prime Minister’s numerous responsibilities and the current critical issues facing the state, we request that his testimony be scheduled for March 2025,” Netanyahu’s chief lawyer stated.
Netanyahu faces charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in three separate cases, known as Cases 1000, 2000, and 4000. These allegations involve accusations of receiving lavish gifts from wealthy businessmen in exchange for political favors, and attempting to manipulate media coverage to his advantage.
The Prime Minister has consistently denied all allegations, asserting that he is the victim of a politically motivated witch hunt. “These charges are baseless and aimed at toppling a right-wing government,” Netanyahu has repeatedly claimed.
The request for a delay has sparked criticism from opposition leaders and anti-corruption activists, who argue that Netanyahu is using his office to evade justice. “This is yet another attempt by Netanyahu to delay the judicial process and avoid accountability,” said opposition leader Yair Lapid. “Justice delayed is justice denied.”
Legal experts are divided on the implications of the delay. Some argue that the Prime Minister’s schedule legitimately necessitates postponement, while others see it as a tactic to prolong the legal process. “While it is understandable that a sitting Prime Minister has a demanding schedule, the principle of equality before the law must be upheld,” said a prominent legal analyst.
The trial has already seen numerous delays and legal wranglings since it began in May 2020. Netanyahu’s lawyers have frequently argued for postponements and procedural adjustments, citing the complexity of the case and the demands on Netanyahu’s time as head of government.
Public reaction to the latest delay request has been mixed. Netanyahu’s supporters view it as a reasonable request given his responsibilities, while critics see it as an abuse of power. “This delay is unacceptable. Netanyahu must face justice like any other citizen,” said a protester outside the court.
The court has not yet ruled on the request, but the decision will be closely watched as it could set a significant precedent for how cases involving high-ranking officials are handled. If granted, the delay would push Netanyahu’s testimony well into his current term, potentially impacting his ability to govern amid ongoing legal battles.
The outcome of Netanyahu’s corruption trial is likely to have far-reaching consequences for Israeli politics. A conviction could force him to resign and trigger a political upheaval, while an acquittal might strengthen his position and validate his claims of political persecution.
As the legal process continues, Israel remains divided over the allegations against its longest-serving Prime Minister. The trial, and the request for a delayed testimony, underscore the deep political and social divisions within the country.
